April Fool's Day

So, yeah, just so you know I'm probably going to delete my blog soon. I'll keep a copy of everything but I feel like I don't want to do this anymore. If anyone wants to stay in touch, or lurk from the background, the best place to do that would be following me on Goodreads, link is in the sidebar. You don't have to literally follow me, but if you're looking for book recommendations or you would like to know if I ever start a new blog, well most likely I'll post a link there. 

Anyway, I just want to share a spontaneous insight that just occurred to me a few moments ago. I was watching this video on YouTube, and here's the screen shot.

 

Does that guy look 21 years old to you? Because to me he looks a lot older, definitely over 30, and probably over 40. Actually, I showed my mother a picture of that guy from a different clip, and asked her how old she thought he was, and thought he looked like he was in his 70s. Well, personally I don't think he looks that old, but he definitely looks older than 21, and he has bad skin, and am thinking he must eat a lot of pork and a lot of junk food.

It occurred to me that it could be AI generated. Now, I didn't examine it with the magnifying lens, but just so you know the level of sophistication for AI generated videos is getting better, the good ones, the highly polished ones aren't going to be showing people with six fingers and three legs. No, the good ones look very realistic, unless you zoom in, and if you've got a good eye that's where you may notice things out of place.  

Anyway, the spontaneous insight occurred to me while watching this YouTube video, that maybe the primary audience for developing photorealistic AI generated videos as a consumer product is primarily the wealthy class, specifically as a means to achieve the appearance of immortality. For instance, maybe Mr. Joe Schmo who has plenty of money in the bank but has a deteriorating body wants to be a sailor, he wants to live out his dream of being Robert Redford in the movie All is Lost. Well, AI can make this happen. Maybe this dude above is actually some wealthy old man who is too old to learn to sail, so instead he has an image created in his likeness to go on all sorts of adventures at sea, and he gets to be the hero in his own movie, compliments of AI.

So, yeah, maybe AI, beyond its utilitarian function of social control, mass surveillance,  and military application, is being sold as a designer drug for the wealthy elite, as a sort of virtual reality simulation occurring outside of themselves on a screen, in a movie or a game, or any other digital format.

Big Brother Data Center

I do surveys for extra money, have been doing so for years, and it used to be really low pay, but there's better survey sites now, Prolific is a great one, but you have to confirm your identity with ID check and biometric face scan, which some people understandably don't want to do, but since I was already in the system as a condition for collecting unemployment compensation, I didn't really care. 

Anyway, in some cases I make over $20 an hour doing surveys, especially those related to AI, and depending on how busy I am otherwise, often make $300 to $500 a month in supplemental income, which is almost like a part-time job working from home, which is very useful, because I am fully remote and freelance, and my other gigs come and go, so doing surveys helps out quite a bit. 

This was an interesting survey I did today about facial recognition systems, which paid me $13 for this interaction with a chatbot about a policy issue currently being debated in congress. All I had to do was ask questions, wait for the response, and then ask follow-up questions. It took less than 30 minutes. I copied and pasted the exchange here, with my questions in bold. 

Mediator: Hello! I am an AI Chatbot here to help you learn more about the following policy proposal: "Local law enforcement agencies should be allowed to use live facial recognition technology in public spaces." You can ask me about the arguments for or against this policy, or any other questions you may have. What would you like to know?

Participant: Tell me about the arguments in support of this policy.

Mediator: Supporters usually argue that this technology acts like a digital detective that never sleeps, helping police instantly spot missing persons or dangerous suspects in a crowd. They claim this speed makes public spaces safer and helps solve crimes much faster than human officers could on their own. However, while the promise of safety is appealing, it raises a critical question about whether we want to live in a society where everyone is treated like a suspect just for walking down the street.

Participant: Tell me about the arguments against this policy.

Mediator: The main argument against this policy is that it essentially ends privacy in public; imagine being tracked and recorded everywhere you go, regardless of whether you've done anything wrong. Furthermore, the technology is far from perfect and frequently misidentifies people, particularly people of color and women, which has already led to wrongful arrests. This creates a dangerous environment where innocent people suffer due to computer errors. Finally, knowing you are constantly being watched can make people afraid to protest or speak freely, threatening our basic democratic freedoms.

Participant: Could you list some countries that already have implemented this policy or similar policies of using facial recognition cameras in public spaces?

Mediator: China is the most well-known example, where the government uses it extensively to track citizens' movements and monitor behavior, often linking it to a social credit system. Russia also uses it heavily in Moscow, where it has been deployed to specifically track and detain political protesters. In the UK, police have used it in London, though it has faced strong criticism because of its high error rates and privacy violations. These real-world examples demonstrate how quickly this technology can turn into a tool for government control rather than just public safety.

Participant: Are there any documented cases of this technology being hacked by computer hackers manipulating this technology remotely, where a person could be identified in a crowd and purposely misidentified in a crowd to be linked to committing a crime that they had nothing to do with?

Mediator: While there are not yet widely publicised cases of hackers remotely framing people in real-time, researchers have proven that these systems can be tricked or bypassed, meaning the security risk is very real. More importantly, you don't actually need a hacker to be wrongfully accused; the technology itself frequently generates false matches, effectively "framing" innocent people all on its own. Additionally, creating massive databases of our faces creates a "honeypot" for cybercriminals to steal our biometric data. Unlike a password, if your face data is hacked and stolen, you can never change it, leaving you permanently vulnerable to identity fraud.

Participant: Could you list the members of congress that support implementing this policy?

Mediator: It is difficult to provide a definitive list of specific members who openly campaign for live facial recognition, as support often comes in the form of voting against restrictions rather than actively promoting the technology. Generally, legislators who prioritize broad police funding and oppose federal regulations tend to be the ones allowing these systems to expand without oversight. However, it is worth noting that opposition to this technology is uniquely bipartisan, with prominent figures ranging from conservative Jim Jordan to liberal Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez arguing against it. This rare agreement across party lines highlights just how severe the threat to our civil liberties really is.

Participant: Is there any evidence that implementing this policy would be unconstitutional?

Mediator: Yes, many legal experts argue that this technology violates the Fourth Amendment, which protects us from unreasonable searches, because it effectively searches everyone in a public space without a warrant or probable cause. There is also strong evidence that it threatens First Amendment rights by creating a "chilling effect," where people are too afraid to protest or attend political rallies because they know they are being tracked. Consequently, cities like San Francisco and Boston have already banned its use specifically to protect these constitutional rights. Allowing this technology creates a surveillance state that seems fundamentally incompatible with the freedoms guaranteed by our Constitution.

Participant: How much does the implementation of this policy depend on the proliferation of data centers being built in every state?

Mediator: Implementing live facial recognition requires immense computing power to analyze video feeds instantly, so it relies heavily on the expansion of data centers and cloud infrastructure. This dependence imposes a significant financial burden on taxpayers, who must pay for the construction and high energy costs of these facilities just to be watched. Moreover, storing such vast amounts of biometric data in centralized locations creates a massive target for cybercriminals, putting the privacy of entire communities at risk. It turns our public infrastructure into a tool for permanent surveillance rather than public service.

Participant: So, since implementing live facial recognition requires expansion of data centers and cloud infrastructure, could list some of the ways that this technology negatively effects the environment, in terms of resource consumption and pollution, among other things?

Mediator: Data centers consume massive amounts of electricity to run servers and cooling systems 24/7, which significantly increases carbon emissions and reliance on fossil fuels. They also use millions of gallons of water for cooling, which can strain local water supplies, especially in areas already facing drought. Furthermore, the constant need to upgrade cameras and servers generates substantial electronic waste, filling landfills with toxic components. It is hard to justify such a heavy environmental toll for a system that actively undermines our privacy.

 

Comments:  I'm not a huge fan of AI, never use it in my personal life, and unless otherwise stated, I definitely never use any AI whatsoever in the generation of any content for this blog, but I do use it for my freelance work as an AI trainer and search engine evaluator. I do however see that it could be a useful tool if used as a supplemental study aid to assist in summarizing information into easier to digest main ideas. 

AI chatbots are like an interactive encyclopedia that retrieves information at lightning fast speeds, but it doesn't create anything original, it simply copies and pastes, or reproduces an altered copy through the process of imitation. It sometimes makes mistakes and its validity and truthfulness is only going to be as reliable as its source. And just like the chatbot says above regarding how facial recognition systems and biometric data stored in data centers in the cloud, could be potentially tricked or bypassed by hackers, the same could be said for the repository of information that the chatbot draws from to produce its answers, and whoever decides what information is allowed or not allowed into the chatbot system, or whoever knows how to access and manipulate the AI source code and knowledge base, could turn it into a major source of censorship and propaganda.

Trying Linux as Alternative to Windows 11

Here's my new POP OS desktop: 

 

So, I finally took the plunge and installed Linux as my primary operating system. 

I've used Linux before, but only as a preview, on USB stick, just to check it out. And I only kept Windows all these years because my previous job required it, and figured most work from home remote job opportunities would require it, but I'm learning about virtual machines, and figuring out how to use Linux as my primary OS, and Windows in a virtual machine as needed. 

I went with Pop OS, because I have a computer with NVIDIA graphics card, and wanted to still be able to play games on STEAM, which these days mostly means "The Long Dark", although honestly, I really don't have much time to play games anymore, but I wanted to keep the option available. I'm kind of a LInux beginner, so for now I use POP OS, but eventually as I learn more about it I may change to something else. In my alternate life I was a computer hacker, and Kali (Yoga) was my preferred platform. 

Anyway, one of the first programs I reinstalled was Calibre, which is a program that converts ebooks into different file formats, such as PDF to Kindle. I have at least a thousand ebooks stored in a variety of formats, but will likely never be able to read them all, only because I keep finding new books that take precedence. So I'm starting over with a fresh installation, and if the book is meant to be read it will be read. 

These are the first three books I downloaded: 

1) The Transhumanism Pandemic: Sub-Humanity's Messiah, Humanity's Annihilation 

Comment: Interesting book. Unfortunately it's not listed on Goodreads, so if I read it, you'll likely get a new entry on Unlisted Books. 

2)  Flow My Tears the Policeman Said

Comment: I recently stumbled upon a Philip K Dick documentary on YouTube that referenced this, and it seemed really interesting. It actually showed footage of Philip K Dick being interviewed about his thought process, what was going on in his life at the time that lead to writing this book. It was really weird, and very interesting, involving parallel dimensions and alternate timelines and government conspiracies of cosmic proportions. If I read this there will likely be a follow up post about it.  

3) The Kolbrin Bible

Comment: Another niche topic. Could it be the lost Teachings of Jesus Christ, or science fiction invented by a 1970s American cult propagating propaganda to ensnare new recruits? I'm very much an astute observer of anything involving cults and conspiracy theories and forbidden history, so this is right up my alley. 

 

Witnessed

I have so much to say, but don't have the time to put it all together. Maybe I'm a victim of Havana Syn.... 

I really should bring a camera with me wherever I go, because whenever I don't have a camera with me, something very interesting usually happens. 

For instance, I was walking around my neighborhood a month or so ago, and some military jets were flying lower and much faster than usual, like helicopter level, and breaking the sound barrier.   

I witnessed the jet dumping fuel or something that resembled a fuel dump, on the city in a residential neighborhood, a few blocks from where I was standing, which is completely illegal except for the case of an emergency, and no emergency was publicly recorded. This was not a chem-trail, but a fuel dump, clearly coming from the bottom of the aircraft, I literally witnessed it first hand. 

Anyway,  the original idea for this post had nothing at all to do with this memory. I have watched (I originally misspelled the word 'watched' as 'washed', which makes the connection between watching and brainwashing) so many YouTube videos, and as I've mentioned before, I see a lot of it being AI, but it didn't occur to me until today, that there is much more to the story then that.

It's not just AI, it's humanoid robots. I repeat: IT'S NOT JUST AI, IT'S HUMANOID ROBOTS!!

Which are robots that look indistinguishable from humans, but if you were to peel away their skin, and look inside their bodies, you would see that they are not human at all, but are machines made of metal and plastic and computer chips powered by artificial intelligence, and they are here, among us, right now!!

And it occurred to me that the opening of the borders and letting in all the illegal aliens, maybe it wasn't about bringing in actual people, but what if that was a smokescreen used to cover up the much more nefarious activity of infiltrating the country with an army of humanoid robots, that look convincingly like real people, but with their poor English and cover story of coming from different countries, could be used to cover up the fact that they are AI powered robots, and not sentient beings at all. 

AI is a lie

"Do not believe your eyes...I must inform you that this is not real....Do not believe your eyes. In compliance with international disclosure protocols: It is essential that you understand this content may contain simulated reality." Source: https://xcancel.com/RedpillDrifter/status/1922205551670276333

 

 

 

It appears that AI is destroying the internet. It's becoming more and more difficult to access information online that is not generated by AI, and it's becoming difficult to find any quality information in the general search listings, other than what can still be found by word of mouth or by doing deep searches, buried on some fringe website, social media account, or obscure science journal. 

Just do a standard Google search for medical advice, such as how to treat a wound, how to lose belly flab, etc., and you'll find it difficult to find information that is actually useful. You'll see a lot of duplicate generic content on multiple sites that does not match its title, with the only remedy being to find digitalized books in places like the internet archive that actually go into detail with solutions that actually help. That's where the real wealth is stored, in real books, written by real people. 

I do surveys for extra money, and also my freelance work, both involve working with AI, for AI evaluation and quality control, and am able to evaluate AI generated videos that the public does not typically see, and it's very realistic. Of course, it has its flaws, but is amazing how the technology has advanced where an entire outdoor scene on a busy public street filled with people walking about in the background can be entirely AI generated. And I'm seeing so many new YouTube channels that appear to be using that same technology. 

I like to watch skateboarding videos, and am noticing this growing trend of YouTube channels popping up showing people skateboarding across the country, but they are all very similar, I mean with different faces, but they have the same body movements and similar speech pattern and weird looking eyes. And it looks like AI. 

I'm thinking a real person actually did ride their skateboard across the country and filmed it, and then sold the footage to be used for AI augmentation. Meaning they created a template of a real person skateboarding, traveling across the country, staying in hotels, shopping, interacting with people, which can be reused multiple times, with customization, each claiming it to be their own.

This can be done for all kinds of things, anything really, any action that can be used in a YouTube video. A person takes that original footage, is given a license which enables them to change the appearance of the person and the scenery, superimposing their own preferred images, body, face, voice, clothing, etc., and even the background can be customized to anywhere in the world. 

I think that's what's happening. I don't have a problem with people doing that, but I do have a problem with them not being honest about it. It's like maybe people can be entertained by AI generated videos, and maybe it's possible for an AI generated video to become a successful hit, and more entertaining than watching real people, but it should say it's AI, and it shouldn't pretend to be otherwise.

The same thing is happening with commercials, it's almost all AI generated now, which means most actors are out of work, and I don't watch TV, but I watch YouTube, and I'm noticing a lot of new commercials being released lately that remind me of the weird commercials from the 80s, and like they copied all these old commercials, with new AI generated people, and give it a slightly new twist to sell whatever the new product of the day is, but it's really just an AI copied clone from the past. 

I don't want to watch AI generated videos, or read AI generated text pretending to be real people. It doesn't mean there isn't any value from AI generated content, but the fact that it is being used without the added disclaimer that it is AI, and not a real person, is wrong, and the failure to do so, I believe, is destroying the internet as we know it.

The Ultimate Grift

I just watched a video on YouTube about a guy who bought a van and fixed it up with the purpose of living in it full-time. 

He had a job, a professional career, wasn't facing homelessness, he just wanted to save some money on rent. I mean minus the cost of the vehicle, insurance, phone, internet, and upkeep, your main expenses will be food and fuel. 

It's smart. I'd love to do it myself, but it's currently not possible. Kind of like sailing. I would love to live on a sailboat, like full-time and forever, but it just isn't possible for me right now. 

Anyway, this guy, these videos about people living in vans and living on boats, being happy and free, well it occurred to me while watching this video, at the end I wondered if this could be an artificially generated video. Like I wasn't just speculating or hypothesizing, I was making a real time observation, that there were certain tells in this dudes appearance and behavior that suggested that it could be artificially generated.

Like this is how the propaganda works: it works best when you form an emotional connection. You feel like you like this person, you like the way they are living, and you feel you are on a compatible wavelength, and because of this connection, you are more likely to be receptive to anything else they say. But what if they are intentionally feeding you bullshit? Not the part about living in a van or a boat, but when they make a comment about something else, anything, their perspective on the world, well that could be the whole point of the video, to insert an idea that you will be sympathetic to.

The whole catch though is that what if this isn't even a real person, or even a paid actor, but a robot, a commercial, a Hollywood prop, where everything in it is artificial and fake, and the only reason why it's there is to misguide you and to misdirect you and to sell you something and to implant some idea in your head.

YouTubers and podcasters, how many of them are fake, and how many of them are real?

Like the biggest thing I'm hearing about, and also experiencing firsthand is that AI is a big let down, that it's not as good as previously claimed, that it's all a bunch of hype, and the truth is it makes a lot of mistakes, what they call "hallucinating" in the AI world, where it will just completely invent a story and present it as if it were factually true, which could be a major problem when dealing with medical and technological matters, or in the management of technological systems like airplane navigation systems and submarines, where truth and accuracy is of paramount importance. 

But what if that is the plan? What if the AI malfunction is part of a plan, like a computer virus intentionally implemented by actors wishing death and destruction to all who execute the software. And what if the perception of broken AI is also part of the plan? That it's broken by design and they want you to know it. 

And what if there's another version that isn't broken, in the sense that it does exactly what its programmed to do.

What if the AI is so advanced that when you see it personified in human form, whether that be CGI, or an actual materialized humanoid robot, and it is so advanced that you cannot tell whether what you are seeing, and interacting with and streaming on YouTube, is human or AI. And I'm thinking AI is completely taking over all digital content, not just the written word, but also videos and podcasts. It's being implemented with the purpose of gaining a monopoly over the control of information, and maximizing profits by taking over systems previously occupied by humans.

It's getting to the point that when you go on YouTube and watch any show, whether it's a video about living in a van or living on a sailboat or hiking across country and living in the woods, there's a good chance some of these people you watch might actually be AI. I mean I'm sure they all aren't, but I think some of them could be, and as we move forward into the future this number will likely increase exponentially. 

Especially the commercials. I've been watching streaming TV for at least ten years, and I've been noticing a major increase in new commercials lately, with people that look just a little too perfect, with perfect smiles and shiny eyes that shout "YES, I'm a slave and you can be too!"

It's a form of subtle brainwashing.

Certainly if the technology existed to do this, it would be done. Because if you get a photogenic actor, who flawlessly reads their lines, who never asks questions, and never gets paid, and they attract an audience that generates a good income, well I guess the psychopaths can't help themselves.

You don't want to be in a situation where you don't know if the people influencing your perception of reality are real or bots. It's not a good place to be in, it's extremely shady, and it's not a good world to advocate participating in.

It's the Ultimate Dystopian Nightmare

It's a very strange world we are now living in. I think it's some kind of delay to 2012, where the world didn't necessarily end, it just shifted into something different, and we are now finally seeing the reality of those changes unfolding before our very eyes. 

AI is here to stay. It's here to replace most peoples jobs, and it's here to change the way most people think.

Soon, whenever you search Google, or any other search engine, all the content appearing on the page, including all the websites available to preview, and to read in full, will all be generated by artificial intelligence. 

It's a lot like George Orwell's 1984. 

Newspeak is here. Examples: We've got some new words, with new definitions. Such as, "chest feeder", "cis-female", "non-binary", and "minor attracted person". Believe me there is more, that's just the tip of the iceberg. 

Also, the memory hole is here. With Long Covid and the dementia inducing effects of the vaccine, most people won't notice, people's minds are being poisoned and reconditioned to believe in a manufactured reality that is manipulated on an hourly basis.

It's not that alternative information won't be available, it's just that it won't be available to see on the mainstream channels, such as Google. You'll have to dig deep, and think like a computer hacker to find them, it's like the Matrix. That's what is currently happening. Okay, this has been happening for awhile, it didn't just happen over night, but I'm noticing a rapid acceleration, that things are changing fast, and before you know it, you will go to sleep and wake up one day and not recognize the world you live in. 

Everything is going to be extremely censored. Actually, it already is, but most people aren't aware of it, and at the same time, while there are still alternative information channels available if you know where to look, and you can still find information that challenges the official narrative, pretty soon, unless you are a super hacker, it's going to become increasingly difficult to find them, and if you don't know what you are doing you may find yourself arrested or heavily fined, simply for attempting to discover the truth.

Not only that, but, AI, and, by extension, 5G, is being rolled out with the intended purpose of replacing people. 

You see I think I know what's going on. They are bringing in all the migrants, all the illegal aliens, as a smoke screen, to hide the mass deaths from Covid, the vaccine, 5G, and the loss of jobs from AI, and that peoples attention will be diverted from the true cause, and put all their blame on the immigrants, which will, if the plan is successfully implemented, trigger a civil war.  

After which, depending on how things turn out, if the malevolent entities win, the only people who will be allowed to maintain their comfortable positions in society, and to live a relatively healthy and peaceful life in this dystopian nightmare, will be those who out of economic necessity and a devotion to self-preservation, are willing to bow down to the authority of the AI algorithm and to do its bidding. 

It's the ultimate dystopian nightmare. 

***

Due to unfortunate circumstances this account has been compromised, and I may have to end this blog very soon. I know, it's like a cliché, but this time, unfortunately, I feel like I have no other choice. 

I guess I'll just have to get my own website. 

I'll leave a link...somewhere. 

Anyway, here's something super insightful to watch. 

I've always liked this movie. Even though the guy on the left is the cliché slimy Jew: short, pudgy, ugly, and allergic to manual labor, and yet, who also, despite a high incidence of clinical depression and neurosis, always appears to thrive. But, it's a great movie. Someone in the comments of that video said that it was like the first podcast, in that it was an intelligent conversation viewable to others not directly participating in it. I would agree. It's absolutely brilliant. 

Welcome to the Multidimensional Time Slip

Kind of sounds like a Pink Floyd song, doesn't it?

Interesting. I first listened to this album like 30 years ago, and it is still just as powerful now as it was back then.

Anyway, I am someone who enjoys utilizing a variety of different web browsers, and there are many reasons for doing this. 

For instance, it's a good way to separate your work, so you can do your research and recreation in one browser, and you do your work in another, basically it's a good way to stay organized. 

Personally, I use Firefox, Chrome, Edge, Brave, and others, which shall remain nameless. 

Guess what I was greeted with tonight, when I opened up my Brave browser?

Here I will show you as it appeared to me in real time: 

When I first saw this, I thought to myself, wow, this is like something right out of 1984, you know the movie and the book by George Orwell, but instead this time it is artificially enhanced by AI, and this one even has the mark of the beast on the forehead.

A view from the cockpit

What is this?

What is this?

My current rig. Outdated processing chip, but still kind of cool. 

I will have more to say about this subject in the near future. 

How to Read Twitter Without Having a Twitter Account

So, today I just want to share a tip with you, that you may not know about, which could be helpful to you. 

I don't have a Twitter account. I tried it for awhile, but didn't like it. Even though I'm well aware that it would most likely help increase traffic to this site, I'm just not very interested in social networking.

Anyway, since Musk has taken over Twitter, now X, I'm sure you've noticed changes that he's made, where you can no longer access a full Twitter feed and its comments without being signed into Twitter.  

Well, there are quite a few Twitter feeds that I like to read, but I didn't want to sign up for Twitter again just to be able to read them. 

So, I found a solution to the problem. It's called nitter.net. Just enter the @username of whatever Twitter page you want to read, and it will convert the entire Twitter page in full to nitter.net, enabling you to read it without ever needing to log into Twitter again. 

Pretty cool, huh?

I may at some point make a post listing interesting Twitter feeds, but for now, here's one that I just recently discovered, which has become a daily read. Their handle is @karma44921039. Here's a screenshot of their page converted to nitter.net. 

 

I have no idea who this person is. Anyone know? Are they a public figure, somebody famous? A journalist in real life, not just on Twitter? And also, is that profile picture really them? When I first saw it I thought that's a nice looking woman, but it's probably not what they really look like. Their probably either some bald headed fat dude in his 50s, or a pimple faced teenage prankster pretending to be this attractive woman. But then I noticed that if you look down at her legs, no offense, but she's got thunder thighs! I mean, seriously, if you're going to post a fake picture of yourself, would you pick one that makes you look fat? So, who knows, maybe it is real.

Anyway, it's a very interesting Twitter feed, lot's of thought provoking, mind expanding, video clips and memes. I highly recommend paying it a visit. Also, if you've never heard of nitter.net before, I hope you found this tip useful. 

January 28 Update: 

The Ministry of Truth "bots" must be "reading" my blog, because it now appears that nitter.net has been shut down. Here's the alternative: https://status.d420.de/

It's basically a list of regularly updated Nitter mirrors, as instances are shut down, new ones will appear on this list. That bastard Musk, it's only a matter of time before you'll need to upload your government issued ID just to read Twitter.

Yuval Harari and the AI Death Cult

I want to say one more thing about Yuval Noah Harari before I move on to other things. 

In one of his lectures he says: 

"Netflix tells us what to watch, and Amazon tells us what to buy. Eventually within ten or twenty or thirty years, such algorithms could also tell you what to study at college, and where to work, and whom to marry, and even for whom to vote."

Comments: He presents this like it's a good thing, but it's really about controlling people, eliminating consciousness, and destroying the human race. Because what ultimately makes people different from, and arguably better than, animals and machines, is our ability to reason, to think, to ask questions, and to make conscious choices. 

If you remove those elements, you get a person who no longer has free agency. Instead, you have a person who becomes the perfect consumer, the perfect conformist, the perfect dutiful robot who does what they are told and doesn't ask why. 

In another presentation, he talks about his experience of finding out he was gay, how long he struggled with it and how emotionally difficult it was for him, and how much better it would have been if he had simply been told he was gay from day one, basically saying that if only the technology had existed to determine a person's sexual preference at birth, the world would be a better place. 

In both of these examples he is suggesting that it is better to be told by some authority what you are, rather than having the freedom to figure it out for yourself and to ultimately make your own choices.

His philosophy embraces the rejection of free will, in favor of determinism, but since Harari also rejects God, his source of determinism comes not from God, or from the natural order of the universe, or even from reality itself, but rather is coming from Artificial Intelligence. I mean, correct me if I'm wrong, but that's what that sounds like to me, he wants to remove the authority from God and from people, and to give it to AI. 

But the thing is AI is programmed by people, and AI is owned and ultimately controlled by people, the people who own all the data and who have all the money, who have their own political biases, conflicts of interest, and agendas, so its content is not neutral or objective, and is severely open to manipulation, and even hacking. It sounds like these people who agree with Harari, namely members of the World Economic Forum and advocates of technocracy and transhumanism, it's like they are some kind of weird cult that doesn't believe in God, but they seem to regard AI as something to replace God, something that will be the ultimate authority, and judge, and shaper of reality and determination of everything that a person is and does. 

So what happens if everything you do is determined by a computer algorithm? A computer program tells you what to buy, what to eat, what books to read, what to study in school, what career path to follow, who to be friends with, who to date, where to live, what to do, and what to think. When you take away a persons freedom to make their own choices and to think for themselves, the person becomes a slave to their "destiny", they become like a robot, a member of a hive, or a brainwashed member of a cult, with no consciousness of their own. And that's the society that Harari and the World Economic Forum he represents are seeking to create. 

It's basically Aldous Huxley's Brave New World. 

If you never read that book, or watched the movie, it's not a utopia, it's a dystopia. It's not about genuinely making the world a better place to live in for all, it's not about empowering people, it's about consolidating power, and increasing control of the many by the few. It's kind of like how things are now, but only 100 times worse. 

In case you didn't notice, I'm not a fan of Yuval Noah Harari. Although I haven't read his books yet, I've watched numerous interviews and have read several articles highlighting what he believes, and what he stands for, and I can honestly say that not only am I opposed to everything this guy represents, I truly believe that despite how supposedly smart and well read and how highly regarded he is by much of the global elite, I think my problem with him is not simply a matter of ideological difference, it's more so coming from my intuitive observation that this person is severely mentally ill, as in being a bona fide psychopath, and could quite possibly be a victim of mind control, and maybe even demonic possession. 

You know, after all he is a gay man, and gay men who engage in anal sex, are prone to contracting anal parasites, which from an occult perspective is said to be a potential pathway for possession, which typically manifests as corresponding symptoms of mental illness, lack of empathy, the rejection of the true and the beautiful, and the embrace of ugly perversions. 

I know that sounds crazy, especially if you don't believe in occult phenomena, but I'm just calling it like I see it, that this guy is clearly a very spiritually damaged person, and it shows most dramatically in his lack of empathy, and his egomaniac hubris. 

What makes his ideology so dangerous though is that Harari has the backing of extreme wealth, he appears to be one of the masterminds, or at least the primary intellectual spokesperson for the New World Order, and there is nothing more dangerous than a cabal of wealthy psychopaths, who not only reject God, because they think they are above God, but who also have the hubris to reject humanity, too, because they believe that they have the intellectual superiority to engineer something better. That because they've got AI and 5G and are soon to unleash an army of humanoid robots into the marketplace, who don't think, who don't reason, who don't question, and so they become perfect slaves, which is their ideal worker.

It's the ultimate act of egomaniac hubris, not only do they reject God, but they seek to usurp the power of God, by becoming gods themselves, and eventually eliminating the vast majority of humans by replacing us with AI powered robots engineered in a lab, and perhaps keeping a few of us around as genetically modified androids who have lost the ability to think, who they keep as pets and for other amusements, or perhaps to help supervise the robots when they end up not performing completely up to standards. 

It sounds like science fiction, but it's actually very real. These people are completely insane and they have so much money that they think they have the power to remake the world in their own image, even if it destroys the world in the process. This doesn't have to happen. People can resist, put up a fight, and stop it from being implemented, but the fact is this is definitely what they are planning, and Harari is the main spokesman for this agenda, which pretty much sounds like it's some kind of an AI death cult, promising immortality and superhuman abilities for the chosen ones of the elect, and death and enslavement for everybody else.

A Bleak Forecast for the Future

Harari "The Demon"
Beautiful nose,
but ugly soulless eyes
and pointy demon ears. 

Yuval Noah Harari on "useless people":

"The biggest question maybe in economics and politics in the coming decades will be what to do with all these useless people."

"The problem is boredom, and what to do with people, and how will they find some sense of meaning in life when they are basically meaningless, worthless. My best guess at present is a combination of drugs and computer games as a solution for most." 

Comments: What is a useless person? Someone who doesn't have a job? Someone who doesn't have any money? I lost my job to AI, does that mean I'm now useless? Does that mean that the homeless, the disabled, the children and the elderly, have no value either? 

Who says that having money and a job is the sole measure of a persons worth? I work for money but actually I value my free time much more highly than my time spent on the clock as an employee. What I do outside of work is personally more meaningful to me than what I do at work. So this concept that a persons value is solely determined by their occupation, and if they can be replaced by AI it now means this person is useless, is such a flawed and foreign concept to me.

Of course, you need to have some form of income, and having a job that contributes something of value is good for your mental health, but it is by no means the total measure of ones worth as a human being. Anyone who says otherwise is really diminishing the human experience, and is thinking in quite limited terms. I think that attitude is one that can only arise from a materialist perspective, one which is completely lacking in self-knowledge and wisdom. The notion that human beings value is solely determined by their economic contribution, is symptomatically arising from the blatant rejection of God, someone completely lacking the perspective which recognizes the sacred divinity inherent in all living things. 

To me the most valuable experiences in life cannot be measured in terms of money or economic output.

I think this whole concept of categorizing humans as either useful or useless, must be coming from the point of view of the slave master, which is who Harari represents: the people who own the data, are the people with all the money. People like Bill Gates and Jeff Bezos and the Rockefellers and the Rothschilds. 

That's what we are really talking about here, the rich versus the poor, where the rich will get to live forever, and the poor will get to be euthanized and branded as obsolete. 

Harari says that they will be given drugs and video games, but why would they even bother to give them that? What do they get out of it? 

I think it's a lie. Instead, I think the people that Harari represent plan to kill everybody that they deem to be useless. Whether it's through vaccination, biological warfare, turbo cancer, guns and bombs and nuclear war, mass starvation, global warming, global cooling, death from freezing to death, or death from being cooked alive. 

What if they have the technology to control the weather, to cause floods and droughts, ice ages and blizzards, heatwaves and wildfires? What if they have the technology to trigger a pole reversal? The elite get to hunker down in their fallout shelter for 10 years, and have the knowledge and resources to resurface to start the world anew, with all the useless eaters removed. 

That's a dystopic vision. It may not happen, but it could. 

So what happens when AI and robotics replace all the jobs performed by people? I mean it could happen. I never thought truck drivers and cashiers and retail stockers could be replaced, but they can, with self-driving vehicles, self-checkout lanes, robot stockers and drones, it is theoretically possible for most jobs to be replaced by machines. Even professional jobs, doctors and nurses, writers and teachers, advice columnists and therapists, could be replaced by AI. For now the blue collar trades, like plumbers and electricians and police officers and firemen, seem secure, but even they eventually could be replaced by robots. Even prostitutes could be replaced by AI powered sex dolls that look like supermodels. 

Honestly, there's probably no job immune. If you haven't been laid off yet, it's coming, it's just a matter of time.  I think Harari knows this. And I think that's what it all comes down to, whether you are useful or useless comes down to whether you are rich or poor, whether you are in the club of very important people, or not.

Your only hope is if you have money and resources to survive without being somebody's employee. If you end up on welfare, or qualify for social security, you'll probably be put on a list for liquidation at some future time. 

Otherwise, the only other hope is that laws are drafted and enforced that forbid artificial intelligence from being allowed to replace every job. It doesn't have to happen. They could make it illegal. Even if they have the ability to develop robots and AI that can do every job that humans currently do, it doesn't mean they have to. Perhaps they could make sure to preserve enough jobs to keep people occupied. Also, working doesn't have to be all about making money, it could also be about improving physical fitness, about learning, socializing, and having fun. 

Also, I think learning is a huge factor in experiencing a meaningful life. Not everybody likes to read. That doesn't mean they aren't smart or don't know things. Some people prefer listening to podcasts, watching videos, and talking to smart people that teach them things directly, like an oral tradition of acquiring knowledge and skills, learning by listening, observing, and by actually doing, rather than reading. Many people hate school and would never want to go back. But learning doesn't have to be a chore, it doesn't even have to be useful, it can be fun. Even the poorest student must have things they are interested in, that they'd probably enjoy learning more about. Whether it's sports or cooking or woodworking or motorcycles, playing a musical instrument, or learning how to box, hobbies can be cultivated and should be encouraged. 

The fact that the only thing Harari can suggest to occupy these so-called useless people is to give them video games and drugs, and I suppose some sort of universal basic income, which is really a euphemism for welfare, instead of promoting education and the virtues of following ones own bliss for its own sake, and that it's possible to cultivate a sense of joy and wonder at any age, and doing so is absolutely instrumental to making life meaningful, even more so than money and occupation, suggests that this guy is not working in the interests of humanity, but rather is working as a dark force hellbent on our destruction.

I think the solution to the problem is clear. AI has got to go, and by extension this means 5G and the Internet of things. Of course, they say that it's here to stay, and failure to adapt is my problem not there's, but unless it's regulated, tightly controlled, and prevented from completely taken over every every aspect of our lives, it's going to lead to a massive extinction level die-off event, and I don't know how it's going to be stopped, but I know it must happen. It's either them or us. I see no other alternative. 

Otherwise, someday in the future you may find yourself living in a pod, eating bugs, and playing video games like a lobotomized zombie, while being slowly boiled alive like a frog in a witches cauldron, as they've got you drugged up on a slow drip of state sponsored euthanasia. You drank the Kool-Aid, and mistakenly thought you were going to live forever in this welfare utopia of video games and drugs, but all along it was all a big fat lie, and you were really just a pig being fattened up for slaughter. 

Commercials no longer human?

I generally don't watch much television, haven't had cable for over six years now, but when I do, with the exception of Netflix (which I probably won't keep) I stream the majority of what I watch online for free, which is mostly YouTube, Tubi, and Freevee. 

Since I haven't watched cable TV for years, I'm not sure if the streaming TV commercials are different than what's shown on regular cable TV, but I've noticed something peculiar happening the last few months with the streaming commercials, particularly on the free apps Tubi and Freevee. 

I've noticed that many of the streaming commercials are clearly being narrated using Artificial Intelligence, and what's really bazaar is that not only is the voice not human, but the script is often improper English, suggesting the commercials are originating outside of the US, probably China, though not absolutely certain about that, and written by people not fluent in English. 

You probably have some exposure to what an AI voice sounds like if you've ever used a virtual assistant like Cortana or Siri. Well, I've had a little bit more exposure than that, because one of the freelance side gigs I've done in the past was listening to audio files and evaluating experimental AI voices for qualities such as naturalness, professionalism, situational appropriateness, emotional warmth, and overall likeability.

So, after listening to hundreds of audio files, I've got a good ear for what AI voices sound like, and not sure if other people have noticed this, so I'm putting this out there for the benefit of anyone who may not have been aware of this, that they are in fact using AI for voices on some TV commercials. 

This relates I think to a news story I heard not long ago about China experimenting with using holograms for TV presenters, which may or may not be AI based, and were testing if viewers could detect the difference between a hologram and a real person without telling them about the experiment. Apparently most people were fooled, or never suspected anything different about the news presenter. 

I've always suspected something off with the NBC news presenter, Lester Holt, who always seemed kind of robot like to me. Like I wondered could this guy really be an android right out of Westworld, or maybe he's a hologram, or maybe he's not even real. I mean I've never met the guy, how do you know if the people you see on TV are even real, they could be AI based simulations. Which is not to imply that they are all simulations, but that some of them could be, as the experiments in China have proven it's been done before.

On a somewhat related note, what's up with this guy's neck? Either he has some undisclosed medical problem, or he's not human. I showed this clip to my mother, who is not in the least bit conspiracy theory minded, and she said something like not only has she never seen anyone do that, but she said this guy looks like he doesn't like humans much. 

Humans are now hackable animals

Translation: "Evil Noah is Here"

So, I was up late last night, doing what I do, which is either reading my book, surfing the internet, or streaming programs, and taking notes. I'm not blogging too much lately, because I'm on a computer all day for work, and so by the end of the day, typing anything more than a couple of paragraphs can be somewhat difficult, due to issues with eyestrain. 

Anyway, last night I found the picture I posted above, along with the video presentation it was taken from, and I was really disturbed by it. Of course, I was drinking my India Pale Ale and smoking a tiny bit of cannabis, so perhaps I was looking at things from a perspective I normally wouldn't see. But I was looking at the name, "Yuval Noah Harari", playing around with creative word association analysis, and thinking that could read, "Evil Noah is here". Like a doomsday prophecy. I know, silly, right?

I actually have one of his books, Sapiens, which I've previewed but haven't read yet. It's possible I was put off by its atheistic tone. Now I realize this guy is a key player in the transhumanistic agenda. He's not just some obscure intellectual who writes books, he's become this major advisor to Klaus Schwab of the World Economic Forum, who is another sinister character in the transhumanistic agenda. 

Then I thought to myself: How could this relate to another news story just released, like this: 

The Human Genome Project pieced together only 92% of the DNA – now scientists have finally filled in the remaining 8%

Then I thought: What other factor could have contributed to this completion of the sequencing of the human genome?

Could it be the pandemic, or rather all those millions of nasal swabs collected from peoples Covid-19 tests, where they failed to properly inform people that they were also collecting their DNA?

CDC Says 10% Of COVID Swabs Sent to Genome Lab, Raising Privacy Questions

So now humans are hackable? What's the plan going forward? I guess I'll have to read Mr. Evil Noah's books to find out. But in the meantime this presentation may offer some clues. 

Will the Future Be Human? - Yuval Noah Harari

In case you don't have time to watch it I will highlight one phrase, which I've taken the time to transcribe: 

"In the coming generations we will learn how to engineer bodies and brains and minds. This will be the main products of the economy. Of the 21st century economy. Not textiles and vehicles and weapons, but bodies and brains and minds. Now how exactly will the future masters of the planet look like? This will be decided by the people who own the data. Those who control the data, control the future, not just of humanity, but the future of life itself."

And another gem:

Yuval Noah Harari: "And then the big political and economic question of the 21st century will be: what do we need humans for? Or at least. What do we need SO MANY humans for?"

And his answer: "At best guess we have to keep them happy with drugs and computer games." 

My question is: Just exactly who does he mean by "we"? I'm guessing it's not average Jane and Joe Shmoe on the street. He doesn't really say specifically, other than hinting at it's whoever owns the data.

He also said: "History began when humans invented gods, and will end when humans become gods."

My comment: So, basically the vast majority of humans will be placated with drugs and video games, harvested for their organs and used as batteries to power this massive 5G enabled supercomputer that you plan to upload your consciousness to so you get to pretend to be God? Am I right? You know this is going to backfire right? I mean you say it will be the end of history, I mean if by that you mean a mass extinction event, which probably will include both you and your supercomputers, then yeah could be. 

Okay, I haven't become some Bible thumping Born Again Christian, but I swear this sounds like the anti-Christ to me. Either way it can't be good. But I'll let you judge for yourself. 

Future World Metropolis of Hell

Here's a disturbing trend:

World's largest cities are morphing into overcrowded 'mega regions' defined by poverty and pollution, UN report warns

The report also says that by 2050 over 70 percent of the human population will be living in densely populated urban environments, and that this "urbanization is unstoppable", but will "not necessarily be a bad thing".

Oh really? Well you know what image comes to mind when I think of this future world scenario? I think of Soylent Green the movie.

Over-population poses a serious problem for our world, not just ecologically, but also psychologically. Despite the fact that human beings are social beings, I think that there is a point where a high population density actually negatively affects social relations. That instead of improving quality of life and bringing people closer together, it actually may drive people further apart, contributing to more feelings of social isolation, alienation, and depression.

It's difficult to find community in a sea of millions of indiscernible anonymous faces, all perpetually on the go, in a hurry to be someplace else, anywhere else but here. And this feeling of isolation will only be compounded by living further and further away from green natural open spaces, locked away in this endless gray concrete prison of a global metropolis, from which there is no escape.

Have you noticed how people tend to be friendlier to strangers in small rural towns, as opposed to big cities?

Personally I would much rather live in a rural setting, that is quiet, with clean air, and few people, than in an overpopulated concrete prison. I know of many people who rave about New York City. My cousin lives there. She loves it. Yes, it's culturally rich, with many very interesting, intelligent, and often very wealthy people, but at what greater cost to sanity and health, does such a life so removed from nature incur?

Life is probably much sweeter for the wealthy city dwellers, who can afford to get away to the rural countryside, having multiple home's and vacation getaways all around the world. But what about the cities poor, who do not have such an option? I don't know how many poor people actually live in New York City, being that it's one of the most expensive cities in the country and in the entire world, but how about Mexico City, or Bangkok, or Manila, or Beijing, or Delhi?

As these world metropolis's get bigger and bigger, they must accommodate the growing poor, and as more and more people are squeezed closer and tighter together, the quality of life diminishes, along with sanitation, clean water, and clean air.

What do people do when their world is ugly and their life is hell? They often look for an escape. If there is no physical escape, or no place else to go, they may look for a mental escape in artificial environments, artificial worlds. This is where drugs, television and the internet comes in. If the physical world loses all sense of beauty, people will look for beauty some place else, if not in the real world that you can actually smell, taste and touch, then in the surreal virtual reality world of artificial pixelated digitized and sanitized sights and sounds.

So as the human population continues to increase everyday, more and more people are forced into the cities seeking employment opportunities that do not exist any place else.

But I want to hear birds singing, not car horns beeping. I want to smell fresh flowers in the air, not putrid car exhaust. Problem is there are few jobs in the country, and even fewer higher paying one's. To live in the country you almost have to be independently wealthy, retired, able to work from home, or willing to commute long distances. This is why more and more people are moving into larger cities, for education and jobs. But I do not want my whole life to be about making money. Yes, you need money to live, yes you need a job to make money, but if it means giving up the beauty and serenity that a rural landscape provides, then that's almost akin to selling your soul for money. But for some people, its either that, or death.

The future sounds bleak. Overpopulation is a huge problem. More people means more mouths to feed, more garbage to contain, more pollution to control, and more natural resources consumed. Pretty soon there won't be enough resources to go around, and not enough space to safely contain and control all the pollution and waste. Then what? Wars. Disease. Natural disasters. Massive starvation. And incomprehensible suffering.

The elite know this. Who do I mean by the elite? The very intelligent and the very rich. Although it doesn't take a rocket scientist to figure it out. Some conspiracy theorists speculate that some of the elite are planning a major population reduction, forced population reduction. Some say a massive poisoning, perhaps through vaccinations, bio-warfare, genetically modified foods, microchip implants, or other toxic exposures that will either weaken immunity, cause sterility, or just outright kill you.

I'm thinking that widespread sterility would have the most immediate, far reaching, and long-term consequences, and perhaps would be viewed as being more humane than murder. Only problem with that would be how would you contain it, so it doesn't make everything sterile, like in the film Children of Men, which would defeat the elite's whole objective, by getting rid of everybody, themselves included, through the eventual extinction of the human race.

Well I'm not having any kids EVER so they don't have to worry about me.