Sound of Freedom Film: Potential Red Flags

Last month I posted a video clip of an interview of Jim Caviezel with Steve Bannon, promoting his new film Sound of Freedom, about the sex trafficking and organ harvesting of children. I'm not really a fan of Bannon, but I thought he gave a very fair and levelheaded interview. 

Anyway, I didn't realize at the time that there are some legitimate red flags concerning that film, suggesting it may not be what it seems, that it may actually be a smokescreen to misdirect and to obfuscate the truth, and having some other ulterior motive then to actually stop sex trafficking.

1) It's a very complicated subject, but some of the red flags are that Tim Ballard, the real life agent played by Jim Caviezel in this film, is a Freemason. And why is that important? Well, apparently the Freemasons are promoting some microchip implant tracking system, you know marketed as a way to track your kids, in case they get kidnapped, they'd be able to find them through GPS. And what better way to convince people to get chipped then by watching a movie that will make them fearful of being kidnapped or organ harvested? 

What if the intention is not to stop trafficking at all, but really it's for some other reason, such as to push this microchip implant, to increase control and acquiescence to this no escape total surveillance system, because once you get chipped, you're tracked for life. Ever feel like dropping out and going to live in a cabin in the middle of the woods in Alaska, well if you're chipped they'll still be able to find you, because maybe you owe taxes, or maybe you didn't pay for a permit to live where you built this cabin, or to fish, or to raise chickens, or to chop down trees for wood, or to pay your carbon tax on those wood stove emissions, etc. etc. 

This movie could be like a covert advertisement for the chip, similar to what I proposed in my "Fake News, Real Commercials", which was mostly about the manipulation of news, but could just as easily apply to other forms of media, such as television, movies, and music. You know the idea that a movie isn't just made simply to entertain or to make money, but maybe it's actually selling some idea, you know pushing an agenda, and not necessarily a naturally occurring one, but something that some think tank of strategists masterminded and then sold to Hollywood to put in their film, not even necessarily as the main story line, but a theme running in the background, you know like maybe subtly promoting transgenderism or something. 

2) The second red flag is who is funding the film? Who is funding the film? I'm sure the answer is out there, somewhere, and once you find it, you'll know that something doesn't quite add up. It's suspicious. 

3) The third red flag, Jim Caviezel is a Catholic, pictured meeting the pope, bowing down to him, holding his hand, and yet no comments, no outrage from Jim about the extensive pedophilia in the Catholic church, the abuse of orphans at the hands of Catholic and Jesuit missionaries, which is totally connected to trafficking, and is totally being covered up, and is widespread and ongoing. And that's the thing, this movie Sound of Freedom, which I haven't yet seen so I could be missing something, but from what I understand it seems to be focusing only on the trafficking of children from Latin America, it doesn't talk about the fact that it's not just poor indigenous children in third world countries, it's happening right here too, and to overlook the rampant pedophilia of the church, and the exploitation of children in Catholic and Jesuit orphanages and missionaries around the world, seems a bit suspect. I mean okay, the movie is just about this one aspect of it, but the fact that these other things are not brought up in interviews seems like a red flag to me.

4) Anyway, I haven't seen Sound of Freedom yet, because I don't go to movie theaters anymore, but as soon it's available for streaming, I'm definitely going to see it, but am now somewhat suspicious of its motives. Even that Jim Caviezel, I've seen so many interviews of him now, and it's like when I posted this clip, it was the first interview I saw about this film, and I thought it was great, but now I've seen literally dozens of interviews, and it's like he's saying the same thing in everyone, like word for word it's the same, like this guy is an actor, he could easily be reading a script for these interviews, you know it's just a little fake after awhile. And of course there is the adrenochrome angle and the association with QAnon (For more info see: this and this and this one is very disturbing so read at your own risk) which could be a disservice to people taking this film seriously. But of course as a fan of David Icke for over twenty years now, I'm pretty open minded to these things, so personally I find it completely possible that there are malevolent extraterrestrials living among us who feast on trauma induced human blood. Not saying I know it to be true, but I wouldn't completely rule out the possibility of it being true either.

Still, regardless of what anybody else says about it, even if there are negative ulterior motives to it, as far as I'm concerned the film still has value, because it raises awareness to the reality of child sex trafficking and organ harvesting, and most importantly it also purports to expose deep levels of government corruption and complicity in crimes against humanity, suggesting that all three letter agencies are in on it, at least on a need to know basis. But the problem is how do you prove that? Because you don't. You can't. Any legitimate investigation gets shot down, and key people always seem to end up dying by car accident or plane crash or suicide or the forever untraceable oldest trick in the book death by heart attack. So, where does it leave us then? You find out about something so evil, so terrible, that's almost impossible to believe, and yet it's real, and it's happening, and your government is allowing it to happen, and they are in on it, and yet, there's nothing you can do about it. So, fuck you, right. They are exposing the truth, but also at the same time they are exposing that you are powerless to stop it. 

Well, I found this clip below that sheds some more light on it. It's a totally different perspective, and I'm not sure if I agree with everything this guy says, but it's interesting. 

 

Source: https://www.bitchute.com/video/SmgObaqyPoRf/

And also, for a much longer podcast about this, which really goes in depth about the pedophilia of the Catholic church, see: OWEN BENJAMIN | #1729 https://www.bitchute.com/video/0IMZO7CcLWnJ/

December 17, 2022 - Miles Mathis

The Matrix: Follow the white rabbit

The more I read about the Jews, the Illuminati, and the New World Order, the more convinced I am that this stuff is not conspiracy theory, but conspiracy fact, and then suddenly all these horrible things happening in the world, these crimes against humanity, the poisoning of our bodies and our minds and our planet, it all makes sense if the people responsible for it aren't human, but are a hostile alien threat, like in the movies The Arrival, They Live, and The Thing (1982). 

Here's a quote I came across today:

IT'S ALL FAKE. You aren't living in a Republic or anything like it, and never were. You are living in a Matrix of lies told to break your mind, wash it, and fill it with whatever mush suits the suits. You are a cow to be milked by the merchants and nothing more. The world isn't run by capitalists or even plutocrats, it is run by a predatory cabal of old families who have owned it for five thousand years or more, and they are corrupt beyond all imagining.

Source: http://mileswmathis.com/news2.pdf

Comments: The selected quote was actually in response to the recent disclosure on Tucker Carlson about the CIA being involved in the assassination of JFK. Where Tucker is trying to come across as this renegade truth seeker journalist, exposing the deep state, when let's say what if the event was staged and never really happened, and in actuality Tucker is himself an embedded deep state CIA operative. 

I first learned about Miles Mathis only just a few months ago, when I found a link to his website on the dark web. He's a very prolific conspiracy theory writer, and has written hundreds of articles suggesting that numerous historical and current events are actually staged events, meaning they are fake, and never actually happened, at least not in the way it is claimed. 

I'm not saying I believe this, I don't really know what to believe, I have no way of proving it either way, but I like to gather different viewpoints, and it's interesting to me. Well, I read through several of his writings, and my first impression was honestly that he may be schizophrenic, but that was before I knew anything at all about the guy. I didn't know at the time that he is also a very prolific and accomplished artist, with hundreds of paintings showcased in galleries around the world, and is also a scientist and mathematician, having published books on the subjects of advanced physics and calculus. 

Now I am only at a high school level math and science, so it is beyond my level of knowledge to really comment on the validity of his claims in those areas, but it is apparent to me that he is a person with an extremely high IQ and could justifiably be called a modern renaissance man. So because of this I've become a regular reader of his blog, and am not so quick to dismiss his claims, no matter how crazy or farfetched they may seem at first glance. I am especially intrigued by his comments on sunspots, and need to refresh my knowledge on the subject, because we appear to be headed for some unprecedented events in that area. 

If you haven't heard of Miles Mathis, or read any of his writings, I encourage you to check it out, and see for yourself, whether you think this guy is a madman, or a 200 IQ genius. 

Commercials no longer human?

I generally don't watch much television, haven't had cable for over six years now, but when I do, with the exception of Netflix (which I probably won't keep) I stream the majority of what I watch online for free, which is mostly YouTube, Tubi, and Freevee. 

Since I haven't watched cable TV for years, I'm not sure if the streaming TV commercials are different than what's shown on regular cable TV, but I've noticed something peculiar happening the last few months with the streaming commercials, particularly on the free apps Tubi and Freevee. 

I've noticed that many of the streaming commercials are clearly being narrated using Artificial Intelligence, and what's really bazaar is that not only is the voice not human, but the script is often improper English, suggesting the commercials are originating outside of the US, probably China, though not absolutely certain about that, and written by people not fluent in English. 

You probably have some exposure to what an AI voice sounds like if you've ever used a virtual assistant like Cortana or Siri. Well, I've had a little bit more exposure than that, because one of the freelance side gigs I've done in the past was listening to audio files and evaluating experimental AI voices for qualities such as naturalness, professionalism, situational appropriateness, emotional warmth, and overall likeability.

So, after listening to hundreds of audio files, I've got a good ear for what AI voices sound like, and not sure if other people have noticed this, so I'm putting this out there for the benefit of anyone who may not have been aware of this, that they are in fact using AI for voices on some TV commercials. 

This relates I think to a news story I heard not long ago about China experimenting with using holograms for TV presenters, which may or may not be AI based, and were testing if viewers could detect the difference between a hologram and a real person without telling them about the experiment. Apparently most people were fooled, or never suspected anything different about the news presenter. 

I've always suspected something off with the NBC news presenter, Lester Holt, who always seemed kind of robot like to me. Like I wondered could this guy really be an android right out of Westworld, or maybe he's a hologram, or maybe he's not even real. I mean I've never met the guy, how do you know if the people you see on TV are even real, they could be AI based simulations. Which is not to imply that they are all simulations, but that some of them could be, as the experiments in China have proven it's been done before.

On a somewhat related note, what's up with this guy's neck? Either he has some undisclosed medical problem, or he's not human. I showed this clip to my mother, who is not in the least bit conspiracy theory minded, and she said something like not only has she never seen anyone do that, but she said this guy looks like he doesn't like humans much. 

The People on TV

I've spoken of the virtues of tuning into the immediacy of the moment. You know, being more mindfully aware, more fully conscious and present to whatever is happening right now. Well, what about the idiocy of the moment.

Think about it. "The idiocy of the moment." The thought occurred to me just a few minutes before while switching through the television channels and not being able to find anything worthwhile to watch, and realizing that at that particular moment in time, at least from my particular point of view, idiocy completely ruled the television airwaves. Every single channel was a medium for idiocy.

What do I mean by idiocy? Complete and utter mindlessness. Ignorance. Like babies crying, with the yearning to be fed, comforted, and held. But in this metaphorical scenario, there is no one there to hold them. No tangible way to feed them. No way to teach them, communicate with, or get through to them. All that you can do is passively watch them, crying, helplessly...and this is supposed to be entertainment?

You see, this is when you're supposed to turn the TV off. When you realize that a) you are not being entertained, and b) you are not learning anything useful, and c) you are hating every moment of what you are seeing. Yet, you continue to watch, because you are enslaved to the boredom and the misery of this televised absurdity of life.

Television. Not all of it is bad. But very little of it is good. In many ways it is a mirror of the darkness, the confusion, and idiocy endemic to the collective consciousness of humankind. What I dislike on TV, I dislike face to face and in the flesh. People acting like ignorant, stupid assholes. Yeah, not everybody is a super intelligent, intellectually, morally, spiritually evolved, advanced form of life.

I'm not saying that I am. I lack compassion. I feel hatred in my heart more often than not. But if you are looking for the best that humanity has to offer, you are likely not going to find them on TV. Which is not to say that they'll never make an occasional appearance, but for the most part, more often than not, the people you see on TV are about as clueless and lacking in wisdom as they come.

Pilgrimage as Purification

"The more difficult the journey, the greater the depth of purification."

This is an old Tibetan saying recorded by Austrian mountaineer Heinrich Harrer in his WWII era travel memoir Seven Years in Tibet. I read the book a few years ago, and it stands out in my mind as being one of my all time favorite adventure travel books.

I bring it up because a couple nights ago I watched the movie adaptation, starring Brad Pitt, which is not nearly as good as the book, but being a fan of mountaineering movies in general and anything to do with Tibet, it was worth watching again for that reason alone. Well, this was the second time I saw the film, the first time was shortly after its theatrical debut back in the late '90s. So it had been awhile, was almost like seeing it for the first time. And like I said, while I enjoyed the book version very much, the movie version, though it has some merit, is not really anything special, but on this second viewing one line stood out to me that I found thought provoking enough to write it down in my journal and share it with you here.

"The more difficult the journey, the greater the depth of purification."

I thought that was an interesting line. It was in reference to the fact that the Tibetan people as a whole, both peasant and priest, were culturally orientated toward going on regular pilgrimages. It was believed that the act of pilgrimage, walking long distances over difficult terrain to visit sacred sites, while enduring numerous obstacles along the way, would help cleanse one's sins. That the more difficult the journey, the more rewarding that journey would be. So it was like an act of atonement, a way of finding forgiveness and consolation and strength in moving forward, helping one to discard, however large or small, the bonds of guilt and grief and discontent accumulated from past misdeeds and mistakes.

Though I suppose that's true of all pilgrimages, not just Tibetan, about it being an act of purification; that regardless of which spiritual or religious point of view one is aligned with, a pilgrimage is fundamentally about seeking clarity through the purification of negative thoughts.

Kind of reminded me of the Catholic concept of purgatory, that intermediary stage between death and resurrection, except that the pilgrimage is a sort of a purgatory one experiences while still alive. You could say that it's a way of dying, without dying, to be reborn again in this life; where pilgrimage provides a means of purification along the journey to enlightenment.

As a hiker, who also considers myself to be a spiritually minded person, what I find exceptionally interesting about pilgrimage, is that not only does it involve travel and adversity as a means of purification, but that walking in particular is considered an essential component of it. And I think that is not simply because of the fact that walking is more challenging, particularly because it is slower, and a greater hardship if you must carry your own gear, but that it is also because of the very specific state of mind that walking tends to inspire.

For instance, walking is more humbling, because you are more vulnerable, being momentarily homeless, living out of a bag, perhaps sleeping outside, and at the mercy of the hospitality of strangers. But another reason is that walking is essentially a moving meditation, which helps to ground you to the immediacy of the ever changing landscape of the moment; where there is struggle, but also exceptional clarity and mindfulness which makes it all the more conducive to the task of mental and spiritual purification.